In the documentary
film Waiting for “Superman”, the
director Davis Guggenheim criticizes the public education system in the United
States using several examples of students who strive to be enrolled in charter schools.
In this film, Davis Guggenheim blames the irresponsible teacher unions and the
administrative bureaucracy, and teachers as the main reason for failures in
educating children. Through this film, I learnt more about the educational
issues in U.S.
First of all, the
film Waiting for “Superman” blames the
two teacher unions, the American Federation of Teachers (AFT) and the National Education
Association (NEA), as one reason for the current issues in the public education
in U.S. The rules set by the unions result in difficulty and even inability to
fire teachers who are poor at teaching but who have become tenured in the
educational system. This group of teachers devotes less to the education and does
not put children’s needs at their top priority. What makes the situation even
worse is that the tenure is easy to achieve in public schools. As such, tenured
teachers become lazy and reluctant to contribute. I agree with this point
because becoming tenure means that someone will not be fired no matter how good
or how bad he or she performs. As a result, they will lose the motivation and
drive to work hard and to work for the best of their students as teachers. The
unions and the educational system shall do something to set standards for
tenure so that teachers are motivated to do well in educating (McPherson &
Schapiro, 1999).
Another issue
associated with the teacher unions is the lack of consistent regulations and
disciplines towards the performance of teachers. Lacking of proper standards for
excellent teaching is one aspect. This results in no evaluation methods for
panels to judge how good or how bad teachers perform and how they shall be
awarded or punished as a consequence. The inconsistent standards between expectations
for teaching at levels of the school, state and the federal is another big
issue in education in U.S. The conflicts in the standards for teaching
expectation put teachers in dilemma (Ingersoll, 2002). I agree that a uniform
teaching standards and expectations shall be established to regulate and
evaluate teachers’ performance. Although the standards may be very fundamental,
they do help in regulating and evaluating teachers.
In addition, the number
of enrollment of children into the public education system is another great
concern in the education system in U.S. As shown in the film, the chance of
enrollment into chart schools is like luck draw. Children are given certain
numbers and their administration depends on the drawing of the school. If they lose
this round of lucky draw, they have no chance to be admitted again, which is
very upset. This originates from the limited quota in the public education system
(Manno, Finn & Vanourek, 2000). I totally agree that the limited quota in
public school in U.S. becomes a great concern and issue over the entire nation.
Efforts shall be made to improve this situation.
Furthermore, the
film criticizes that students in U.S. fall behind in many subjects, such as
reading proficiency, mathematics, as compared to students in other countries. It
is stated that this educational issue eventually will jeopardize the
development of the entire country. This view is consistent with the opinions of
Peterson et al in their article “Are U.S. Students Ready to Compete?”. Less
than half of students’ performance reach the NAEP standard. They state that this
issue should raise high attention because “if America is to maintain our high
standard of living, we must continue to innovate….Math and science are the engines
of innovation. With these engines we can lead the world” (Peterson et al.,
2011). However, some teachers do not agree with this argument. They believe
that emotional wellness of students is more important than academic achievement.
I agree that academic achievements are important but emotional wellbeing should
be placed on top of the academic achievements.
Apart from the
above educational issues that are raised in the film, some other educational
issues are also present. First of all, the quality of education is a great
concern. As there are more and more private schools in U.S., the running for
profit in education becomes a trend. Unlike the situation in Finland where no
private schools exist, the private schools in U.S. is blooming. This results in
even higher costs of education which are beyond the holding capacity of many
families. Many college students have been taking loans to finish their
education (Lankford & Wyckoff, 2001). The increasing in private schools
will only further the cost issues in education.
What’s more, as what
many teachers watching this film criticizes, this film seems to ignore the
issue of parents in education but focusing on teachers only. Parents also play
important roles in children’s education. They not only offer the initial
education when children grow up but also assist them in attending schools. The parents’
role in forming disciplines in children at education stage is very important. Some
teachers argue that teachers are supposed to teach knowledge in school instead
of teaching disciplines and that the formation of disciplines should be the
responsibility of parents (Anderson & Minke, 2007).
Another concern
associated with current education in U.S. is the limitation in training the
creativity of students. In Finnish schools, there are much less homework for
children. Instead, they are often engaged in creative plays in education. However,
the standards in U.S. requires that students shall reach certain scores in
order to entry the next level of education. As such, more emphasis is placed on
academic reading and writing, ignoring the training of creativity (Partanen,
2016).
In a brief
summary, although the education in U.S. is much better as compared to that in
many developing countries, there are still a lot of educational issues, such as
poor teaching performance, low standards for teachers, high costs, limited quota
in public schools, that need further attention.
Bibliography
Anderson,
K. J., & Minke, K. M. (2007). Parent involvement in education: Toward an
understanding of parents' decision making. The Journal of Educational
Research, 100(5), 311-323.
Ingersoll,
R. M. (2002). The teacher shortage: A case of wrong diagnosis and wrong
prescription. NASSP bulletin, 86(631), 16-31.
Lankford,
H., & Wyckoff, J. (2001). Who would be left behind by enhanced private
school choice?. Journal of Urban Economics, 50(2),
288-312.
Manno,
B. V., Finn Jr, C. E., & Vanourek, G. (2000). Charter school
accountability: Problems and prospects. Educational Policy, 14(4),
473-493.
McPherson,
M. S., & Schapiro, M. O. (1999). Tenure issues in higher education. The
Journal of Economic Perspectives, 13(1), 85-98.
Partanen,
A. "Finland's School Success: What Americans Keep Ignoring". The
Norton Field Guide: To Writing with Readings. Ed. Richard Bullock and
Maureen Daly Goggin. New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 2016. 976-982. Print.
Peterson,
E. P., et al. (2011) Are U.S. students read to compete? Education Next, 51-59.